- INCI Info
- What is INCI
- INCI FAQs
- On-line Application
- INCI Application - Complete Details
- INCI Nomenclature Conventions
- INCI Application - Name Assignment Timetable
- INCI Name Change Procedure
- INCI Process Flow Chart
- INCI Name Changes
- The International Cosmetic Ingredient Nomenclature Committee
- 2017 INCI Meeting Dates
- Regulatory Information
- Typographical Corrections to INCI Names
- Contact Information
- Member & Industry Resources
- On-Line INFOBASE
- Certificates for Export
- Council Committees
- Events & Webinars
- Career Center
- Industry Connections
- Ingredient Buyers' Guide
- Standardized Raw Material Information Form (RMIF)
- INCI Application
- Supplier Directory
- Science & Safety
- Legislation & Regulation
- Legislative Advocacy
- Industry Regulation
- Labeling & Packaging
- Political Action Committee
- Related Agencies & Regulations
- Global Strategies
- Public Information
- News Room
Statement by John Hurson, Executive Vice President, Government Affairs Personal Care Products Council On Legislation Seeking to Ban Animal Testing For Cosmetic Products
Submitted by Hayley on January 23, 2015
September 5, 2014
CONTACT: Lisa Powers, (202) 297-1232 or Hayley McConnell, (202) 454-0302
“We appreciate the intent of Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) with his bill (HR 4148), which echoes our industry’s longstanding commitment to ultimately eliminate the need to conduct animal testing for cosmetics and personal care products. We look forward to our ongoing dialogue with his office about how best to achieve these goals in a way that doesn’t compromise consumer safety or companies’ ability to innovate and make important new products available to consumers.
“As this legislation continues to evolve, it is important for the public and policymakers to understand the following:
• Cosmetics companies largely stopped animal testing on finished products in the 1980s.
• Companies now only consider animal testing when mandated by government bodies or for safety evaluations of new ingredients when no viable alternative is available.
• Our industry has long advocated for government recognition and acceptance of alternative testing methods. Unfortunately, the Food & Drug Administration has not recognized many alternative tests – we hope removing this obstacle will emerge as a key provision of HR 4148.
• We have been at the forefront in developing alternatives to animal testing. Our industry has invested hundreds of millions of dollars over the past several decades to develop scientifically valid alternative safety testing methods. This research began in 1981 with a $1-million industry grant to establish the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. We have continued to foster research programs that will eliminate the need for animal testing.
“Consumer and product safety remains a top priority for our industry. We will continue our commitment to the development of additional alternative testing methodologies that will ensure the safety of new cosmetic ingredients without the use of animal testing. We look forward to working with the Congressman to achieve a responsible approach – one that ensures ongoing innovation and the proven track record of safety that consumers enjoy when using our products.”
For more information on cosmetic and personal care products, visit www.CosmeticsInfo.org.
Based in Washington, D.C., the Personal Care Products Council is the leading national trade association representing the global cosmetic and personal care products industry. Founded in 1894, the Council's more than 600 member companies manufacture, distribute, and supply the vast majority of finished personal care products marketed in the U.S. As the makers of a diverse range of products millions of consumers rely on everyday, from sunscreens, toothpaste and shampoo to moisturizer, lipstick and fragrance, personal care products companies are global leaders committed to product safety, quality and innovation.